Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Seat Ibiza 2012 fuel consumption

Seat Ibiza from 2012 to 2015 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 15% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 17% higher. Starting from 2012 Seat Ibiza average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2014 it was similar to average, at 2015 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersSeat IbizaAll carmakersSeat Ibiza
2012+21%+25% +23%+31%
Show all years
2013+23%+25% +27%+31%
2014+26%+25% +30%+31%
2015+27%+25% +33%+31%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Seat Ibiza.

2012 - 2015

Seat Ibiza 2012 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines44.2 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.2 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+26%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines57.6 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.2 MPG
5.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+24%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Seat Ibiza 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Seat Ibiza with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 2% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Seat Ibiza 2012 2.0 TDI 143 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Seat Ibiza with 1.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 60 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+26%
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 70 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+19%
Seat Ibiza 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+35%
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+26%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 TDI 75 HP manual 69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.2 TDI 75 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
1.4 liter petrol engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.4 85 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2013 1.4 TSI 140 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.4 TSI FR 150 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+19%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 90 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 90 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+26%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 2.0 TDI 143 HP manual 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+22%
2012 - 2015

Seat Ibiza 2012 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.3 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+24%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines57.9 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+41%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Seat Ibiza 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Seat Ibiza with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 2% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Seat Ibiza with 1.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 TSI 105 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 60 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+24%
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 70 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+16%
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+26%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.2 TDI 75 HP manual 69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+41%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.4 TSI 150 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+17%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 90 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 90 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 ST 1.6 TDI 105 HP automatic 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
2012 - 2015

Seat Ibiza 2012 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines44.1 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.4 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+25%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines56.8 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines46.6 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+34%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Seat Ibiza 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Seat Ibiza with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 2% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.2 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 TSI 105 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Seat Ibiza with 1.2 petrol engine and manual transmission (Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 TSI 105 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 60 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+20%
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 70 HP manual 43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+19%
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+29%
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+35%
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+26%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.2 TDI 75 HP manual 69.2 MPG
3.4 l/100km
49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km+41%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.4 TSI 150 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+20%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 90 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 1.6 TDI 90 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Seat Ibiza 2012 SC 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+26%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Seat Ibiza 2012 2.0 TDI 143 HP manual 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.