Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Seat Leon 2000 fuel consumption

Seat Leon from 2000 to 2006 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 25% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2000 Seat Leon average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2006 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersSeat LeonAll carmakersSeat Leon
2000+4%+15% +5%+15%
Show all years
2001+5%+16% +6%+16%
2002+6%+17% +7%+16%
2003+6%+17% +8%+18%
2004+7%+16% +9%+18%
2005+8%+15% +10%+17%
2006+9%+12% +11%+15%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Seat Leon.

2000 - 2006

Seat Leon 2000 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines29.2 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+16%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines45.4 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines38.7 MPG
6.1 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+17%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Seat Leon 2000 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.8 liters per 100 km or 10% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Seat Leon advertised fuel economy is significantly above average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.9 diesel engine and manual transmission (Seat Leon 2001 1.9 TDi 150 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Seat Leon with 2.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Seat Leon 2001 2.8 V6 204 HP 4x4).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Seat Leon 2000 1.4 16V 75 HP manual 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+17%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Seat Leon 2000 1.6 100 HP manual 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+8%
Seat Leon 2000 1.6 100 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
Seat Leon 2000 1.6 16V 105 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+12%
Seat Leon 2005 1.6 16V 105 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+12%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Seat Leon 2000 1.8 20V 125 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+8%
Seat Leon 2000 1.8 20V 125 HP automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
Seat Leon 2000 1.8 20VT 180 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
24.5 MPG
9.6 l/100km+22%
Seat Leon 2002 1.8 20VT 210 HP manual 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
21.6 MPG
10.9 l/100km+25%
Seat Leon 2003 1.8 20VT 225 HP manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km+19%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Seat Leon 2000 1.9 SDi 68 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
Seat Leon 2000 1.9 TDi 90 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+14%
Seat Leon 2005 1.9 TDi 100 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+15%
Seat Leon 2000 1.9 TDi 110 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+16%
Seat Leon 2003 1.9 TDi 130 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+21%
Seat Leon 2001 1.9 TDi 150 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+19%
2.8 liter petrol engine
Seat Leon 2001 2.8 V6 204 HP 4x4 manual 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
22.0 MPG
10.7 l/100km+19%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.