Seat Toledo 2013 fuel consumption
Seat Toledo from 2013 to 2018 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 8% higher. Since 2013 the Seat Toledo average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been significantly higher than average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Seat Toledo | |||
| 2013 | +23% | +34% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2014 | +26% | +34% | ||
| 2015 | +27% | +34% | ||
| 2016 | +28% | +34% | ||
| 2017 | +28% | +34% | ||
| 2018 | +28% | +34% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Seat Toledo.
2013
Seat Toledo 2013 hatchback fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 45.8 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 38.1 MPG 6.2 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +34% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 liter petrol engine | ||
| Seat Toledo 1.2 75 HP manual | 39.9 MPG 5.9 l/100km |
|
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual | 46.1 MPG 5.1 l/100km |
38.6 MPG 6.1 l/100km+20% |
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual | 47.0 MPG 5.0 l/100km |
37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km+24% |
| 1.4 liter petrol engine | ||
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.4 TSI 122 HP automatic | 40.6 MPG 5.8 l/100km |
|
| 1.6 liter petrol engine | ||
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual | 60.3 MPG 3.9 l/100km |
37.9 MPG 6.2 l/100km+59% |
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.