Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Skoda Octavia 2005 fuel consumption

Skoda Octavia from 2005 to 2009 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 17% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 13% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 20% higher. Starting from 2005 Skoda Octavia average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2008 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersSkoda OctaviaAll carmakersSkoda Octavia
2005+8%+8% +10%+10%
Show all years
2006+9%+9% +11%+10%
2007+11%+9% +12%+10%
2008+12%+9% +13%+10%
2009+14%+9% +14%+10%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Skoda Octavia.

2005 - 2009

Skoda Octavia 2005 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.9 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+9%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines41.5 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines37.8 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+10%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Skoda Octavia 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.7 liters per 100 km or 12% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Skoda Octavia with automatic transmission consumes around 0.6 litres per 100 km or 9% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Skoda Octavia fuel economy is significantly above average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 2.0 TDI 140 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.6 liter petrol engine
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.6 102 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km+7%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.6 102 HP automatic 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+4%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+11%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP automatic 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+8%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Skoda Octavia 2007 Combi 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+9%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.9 TDI 105 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+14%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.9 TDI 105 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+10%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 1.9 TDI 4x4 105 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+14%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+12%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+1%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 2.0 16V FSI 4x4 150 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+12%
Skoda Octavia 2006 Combi 2.0 16V TFSI RS 200 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+14%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 2.0 TDI 140 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+4%
Skoda Octavia 2005 Combi 2.0 TDI 140 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+10%
Skoda Octavia 2007 Combi 2.0 TDI 4x4 140 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+8%
Skoda Octavia 2006 Combi 2.0 TDI RS 170 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+10%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.