Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Skoda Superb 2013 fuel consumption

Skoda Superb from 2013 to 2015 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 17% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 23% higher. Since 2013 the Skoda Superb average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersSkoda SuperbAll carmakersSkoda Superb
2013+23%+8% +27%+28%
Show all years
2014+26%+8% +30%+28%
2015+27%+8% +33%+28%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Skoda Superb.

2013 - 2015

Skoda Superb 2013 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines29.5 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.0 MPG
9.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+10%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+43%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Skoda Superb 2013 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Skoda Superb advertised fuel economy is average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Skoda Superb 2013 1.8 TSI 152 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Skoda Superb with 3.6 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Skoda Superb 2013 3.6 260 HP 4x4).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Skoda Superb 2013 1.8 TSI 152 HP manual 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+3%
Skoda Superb 2013 1.8 TSI 152 HP automatic 32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km
2.0 liter petrol engine
Skoda Superb 2013 2.0 TSI 200 HP automatic 29.4 MPG
8.0 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+24%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Skoda Superb 2013 2.0 TDI 140 HP automatic 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+43%
3.6 liter petrol engine
Skoda Superb 2013 3.6 260 HP 4x4 automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+4%
2013 - 2015

Skoda Superb 2013 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines29.9 MPG
7.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+4%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+12%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Skoda Superb 2013 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Skoda Superb fuel economy is average. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Skoda Superb with 3.6 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Skoda Superb 2013 3.6 4x4 260 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Skoda Superb 2013 1.8 TSI 152 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+4%
Skoda Superb 2013 1.8 TSI 152 HP automatic 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Skoda Superb 2013 2.0 TDI 140 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+12%
3.6 liter petrol engine
Skoda Superb 2013 3.6 4x4 260 HP automatic 25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+4%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.