Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Subaru Legacy 2001 fuel consumption

Subaru Legacy from 2001 to 2003 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 6% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 4% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 8% higher. Since 2001 the Subaru Legacy average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersSubaru Legacy
2001+5%+6%
Show all years
2002+6%+6%
2003+6%+6%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Subaru Legacy.

2001 - 2003

Subaru Legacy 2001 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines24.6 MPG
9.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+4%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Subaru Legacy 2001 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Subaru Legacy with automatic transmission consumes around 1.8 litres per 100 km or 20% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Subaru Legacy fuel economy is average. Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Subaru Legacy with 2.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Subaru Legacy 2001 Outback 2.5 AWD 4x4 156 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Subaru Legacy 2001 2.0 4x4 125 HP manual 25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
Subaru Legacy 2001 2.0 Automatic 4x4 125 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Subaru Legacy 2001 Outback 2.5 AWD 4x4 156 HP manual 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+6%
Subaru Legacy 2001 Outback 2.5 AWD Automatic 4x4 156 HP automatic 23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+11%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Subaru Legacy 2002 Outback 3.0 H6 AWD 209 HP automatic 22.4 MPG
10.5 l/100km
2001 - 2003

Subaru Legacy 2001 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines24.9 MPG
9.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines23.6 MPG
10.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+4%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Subaru Legacy 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Subaru Legacy with automatic transmission consumes around 1.8 litres per 100 km or 20% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars of other manufacturers, the Subaru Legacy advertised fuel economy is slightly better than average, but according to available user reports on actual consumption, real fuel economy is slightly worse than average.
The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.5 petrol engine and manual transmission (Subaru Legacy 2001 2.5 AWD 4x4 156 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Subaru Legacy with 3.0 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Subaru Legacy 2002 3.0 220 HP 4x4).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
2.0 liter petrol engine
Subaru Legacy 2001 2.0 AWD 4x4 125 HP manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km+5%
Subaru Legacy 2001 2.0 AWD Automatic 4x4 125 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
2.5 liter petrol engine
Subaru Legacy 2001 2.5 AWD 4x4 156 HP manual 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+4%
Subaru Legacy 2001 2.5 AWD Automatic 4x4 156 HP automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+12%
3.0 liter petrol engine
Subaru Legacy 2002 3.0 220 HP 4x4 automatic 25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.