Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Suzuki Alto 2002 fuel consumption

Suzuki Alto from 2002 to 2006 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 13% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2002 Suzuki Alto average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2005 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersSuzuki Alto
2002+6%+13%
Show all years
2003+6%+13%
2004+7%+13%
2005+8%+13%
2006+9%+13%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Suzuki Alto.

2002 - 2006

Suzuki Alto 2002 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines42.4 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines37.6 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+13%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Suzuki Alto 2002 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.3 liters per 100 km or 27% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Suzuki Alto with automatic transmission consumes around 1.1 litres per 100 km or 19% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Suzuki Alto fuel economy is slightly better than average.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Suzuki Alto 2002 1.1 63 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+16%
Suzuki Alto 2002 1.1 63 HP automatic 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+10%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.