Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Toyota Aygo 2012 fuel consumption

Toyota Aygo from 2012 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 20% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 28% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 12% higher. Since 2012 the Toyota Aygo average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersToyota Aygo
2012+21%+18%
Show all years
2013+23%+18%
2014+26%+18%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Toyota Aygo.

2012 - 2014

Toyota Aygo 2012 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines51.7 MPG
4.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines44.0 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+18%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Toyota Aygo 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Toyota Aygo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 68 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+16%
Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 68 HP automatic 51.1 MPG
4.6 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+20%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.