Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 fuel consumption
Toyota Land Cruiser from 2009 to 2013 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 11% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 4% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 18% higher. Since 2009 the Toyota Land Cruiser average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been similar to average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Diesel cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Toyota Land Cruiser | |||
| 2009 | +14% | +46% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2010 | +16% | +46% | ||
| 2011 | +19% | +46% | ||
| 2012 | +23% | +46% | ||
| 2013 | +27% | +46% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Toyota Land Cruiser.
2009 - 2013
Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 Prado 150 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km |
| Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines | 19.9 MPG 11.8 l/100km |
| Average real diesel consumption difference * | +46% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 liter diesel engine | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 150 Prado 3.0 TD 173 HP 4x4 automatic | 29.0 MPG 8.1 l/100km |
19.9 MPG 11.8 l/100km+46% |
| 4.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 150 Prado 4.0 282 HP 4x4 automatic | 21.8 MPG 10.8 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.