Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Toyota Yaris 2011 fuel consumption

Toyota Yaris from 2011 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 14% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2011 Toyota Yaris average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2013 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersToyota YarisAll carmakersToyota Yaris
2011+19%+16% +19%+26%
Show all years
2012+21%+16% +23%+26%
2013+23%+16% +27%+26%
2014+26%+16% +30%+26%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Toyota Yaris.

2011 - 2014

Toyota Yaris 2011 fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines40.4 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+17%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+26%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Toyota Yaris 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Toyota Yaris with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Toyota Yaris fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Toyota Yaris 2012 1.5 Full Hybrid 100 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Toyota Yaris with 1.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 99 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.0 69 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+17%
1.3 liter petrol engine
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 99 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+17%
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 99 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+16%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.4 D 90 HP manual 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km+26%
1.5 liter petrol engine
Toyota Yaris 2012 1.5 Full Hybrid 100 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
2011 - 2014

Toyota Yaris 2011 3 doors fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+16%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Toyota Yaris 2011 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Toyota Yaris with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 5% less fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.3 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 99 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.0 69 HP manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+19%
1.3 liter petrol engine
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 99 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+15%
Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 99 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
41.3 MPG
5.7 l/100km+14%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.