Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Golf 1974 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Golf from 1974 to 1983 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline cars
All carmakersVolkswagen Golf

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Golf.

1974 - 1983

Volkswagen Golf 1974 1 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines27.2 MPG
8.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.8 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Golf 1974 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.6 liters per 100 km or 7% less fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox.

Of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 1.5 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 1977 1.5 70 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1974 1.1 1100 50 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+2%
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.1 50 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+1%
1.3 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1979 1.3 1300 60 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
1.5 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1977 1.5 70 HP automatic 28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 1980 1.5 1500 70 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+3%
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.5 70 HP manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km-2%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1976 1.6 GTI 110 HP manual 25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 1980 1.6 1600 Diesel 54 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.6 Diesel 54 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
1974 - 1983

Volkswagen Golf 1974 1 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines27.1 MPG
8.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines36.6 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.8 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant
ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.1 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1974 1.1 1100 50 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+2%
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.1 50 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km+1%
1.3 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1979 1.3 1300 60 HP manual 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
1.5 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1980 1.5 1500 70 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+3%
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.5 70 HP manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km-2%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1976 1.6 GTI 110 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
21.4 MPG
11.0 l/100km+25%
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.6 GTI 110 HP manual 26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km0%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 1980 1.6 1600 Diesel 54 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 1981 1.6 Diesel 54 HP manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 1982 1.6 Turbo Diesel 70 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km+3%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1982 1.8 GTI 112 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.