Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Golf 1993 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Golf from 1993 to 1999 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 1993 Volkswagen Golf average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was less than industry average, at 1995 it was similar to average, at 1997 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen GolfAll carmakersVolkswagen Golf
1993+5%insignificant+3%+4%
Show all years
1994+6%insignificant+3%+4%
1995+5%-+2%+3%
1996+4%-+2%+3%
1997+3%-+3%insignificant
1998+3%insignificant+4%insignificant
1999+3%-+5%+3%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Golf.

1993 - 1999

Volkswagen Golf 1993 3 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines27.5 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines39.8 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines40.0 MPG
5.9 l/100km

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Golf 1993 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.7 liters per 100 km or 27% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 1.6 litres per 100 km or 24% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Golf fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.9 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 1996 Variant 1.9 TDI 110 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.4 60 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+3%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1997 Variant 1.6 100 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km-1%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.8 75 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+3%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.8 75 HP automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km-1%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.8 90 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km-2%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.8 90 HP automatic 24.8 MPG
9.5 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Golf 1995 Variant 1.8 Syncro 90 HP AWD manual 25.6 MPG
9.2 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km-4%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.9 Diesel 64 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km-5%
Volkswagen Golf 1995 Variant 1.9 SDI 64 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km0%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.9 TD 75 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+2%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 1.9 TDI 90 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Golf 1996 Variant 1.9 TDI 90 HP automatic 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Golf 1996 Variant 1.9 TDI 110 HP manual 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Golf 1996 Variant 1.9 TDI 110 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+3%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Variant 2.0 115 HP manual 29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+2%
2.9 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1995 Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro 190 HP AWD manual 22.2 MPG
10.6 l/100km
20.8 MPG
11.3 l/100km+7%
1993 - 1998

Volkswagen Golf 1993 3 cabrio fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines28.8 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *insignificant
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *insignificant

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Golf 1993 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1.5 liters per 100 km or 18% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 1.3 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.9 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 1997 Cabriolet 1.9 TDI 110 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 1.9 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 1995 Cabriolet 1.9 TDI 90 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.8 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Cabriolet 1.8 75 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
28.3 MPG
8.3 l/100km+5%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Cabriolet 1.8 90 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Cabriolet 1.8 90 HP automatic 24.2 MPG
9.7 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+4%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 1995 Cabriolet 1.9 TDI 90 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+2%
Volkswagen Golf 1997 Cabriolet 1.9 TDI 110 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+2%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 1993 Cabriolet 2.0 115 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km-1%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.