Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Golf 2009 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Golf from 2009 to 2013 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2009 Volkswagen Golf average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was similar to average, at 2011 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen GolfAll carmakersVolkswagen Golf
2009+14%+13% +14%+17%
Show all years
2010+16%+15% +16%+18%
2011+19%+15% +19%+18%
2012+21%+15% +23%+18%
2013+23%+15% +27%+18%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Golf.

2009 - 2013

Volkswagen Golf 2009 6 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines33.3 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+14%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines47.4 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines41.1 MPG
5.7 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+18%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Golf 2009 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.2 liters per 100 km or 4% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 2.0 TDI 140 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.4 TSI 160 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2010 Variant 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+23%
Volkswagen Golf 2010 Variant 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+14%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.4 16V 80 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+8%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.4 TSI 122 HP manual 37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+10%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.4 TSI 122 HP automatic 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+17%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.4 TSI 160 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+19%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.4 TSI 160 HP automatic 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km+25%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.6 102 HP manual 32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+1%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2010 Variant 1.6 TDI 90 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+24%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+20%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 1.6 TDI 105 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+15%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 1.6 TDI 105 HP AWD manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 2.0 TDI 140 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+16%
Volkswagen Golf 2009 Variant 2.0 TDI 140 HP automatic 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+15%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.