Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Golf 2012 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Golf from 2012 to 2017 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Starting from 2012 Volkswagen Golf average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2014 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen GolfAll carmakersVolkswagen Golf
2012+21%+31% +23%+38%
Show all years
2013+23%+30% +27%+36%
2014+26%+30% +30%+36%
2015+27%+30% +33%+36%
2016+28%+30% +36%+36%
2017+28%+30% +38%+36%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Golf.

2012 - 2017

Volkswagen Golf 2012 7 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines42.1 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines32.5 MPG
7.2 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+32%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines58.1 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.2 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+38%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Volkswagen Golf 2012 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Golf fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.4 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 140 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 122 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+22%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+31%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+35%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 122 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+25%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 122 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+36%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 140 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+25%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 140 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+40%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+39%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP automatic 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+38%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTI 2.0 TSI 230 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTI 2.0 TSI 230 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 R 2.0 TSI 4Motion 300 HP AWD manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
25.3 MPG
9.3 l/100km+31%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 R 2.0 TSI 4Motion 300 HP AWD automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km+46%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+36%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 2.0 TDI 150 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+37%
2012 - 2017

Volkswagen Golf 2012 7 wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines47.6 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines36.3 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+27%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines53.6 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.2 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+34%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Golf 2012 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.1 liters per 100 km or 2% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.6 TDI 110 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.4 TSI 122 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2015 1.0 TSI 115 HP manual 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2015 1.0 TSI 115 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km+18%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+24%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+30%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.4 TSI 122 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+19%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.4 TSI 122 HP automatic 46.1 MPG
5.1 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+33%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.4 TSI 140 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+25%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.4 TSI 140 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+40%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP AWD manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.6 TDI 110 HP manual 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+33%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 1.6 TDI 110 HP automatic 58.8 MPG
4.0 l/100km
42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km+38%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 2.0 TDI 150 HP AWD manual 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 2.0 TDI 150 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+33%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 Variant 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+33%
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTD 2.0 TDI 184 HP manual 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTD 2.0 TDI 184 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
2012 - 2017

Volkswagen Golf 2012 7 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines40.2 MPG
5.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.9 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+31%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines58.1 MPG
4.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines42.2 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+38%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Volkswagen Golf 2012 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Golf with automatic transmission consumes around 0.3 litres per 100 km or 4% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Golf fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.4 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 140 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Golf with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 122 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.2 TSI 85 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+22%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+31%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.2 TSI 105 HP automatic 49.0 MPG
4.8 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+35%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 122 HP manual 45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+25%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 122 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+36%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 140 HP automatic 47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+40%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.4 TSI 140 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+25%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP manual 61.9 MPG
3.8 l/100km
44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km+39%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 1.6 TDI 105 HP automatic 60.3 MPG
3.9 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+38%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTI 2.0 TSI 220 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTI 2.0 TSI 220 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTI Performance 2.0 TSI 230 HP manual 39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 GTI Performance 2.0 TSI 230 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2016 GTI Clubsport 2.0 TSI 265 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2016 GTI Clubsport 2.0 TSI 265 HP automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 R 2.0 TSI 300 HP AWD manual 33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km
Volkswagen Golf 2013 R 2.0 TSI 300 HP AWD automatic 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Golf 2012 2.0 TDI 150 HP manual 57.4 MPG
4.1 l/100km
42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km+37%
Volkswagen Golf 2012 2.0 TDI 150 HP automatic 53.5 MPG
4.4 l/100km
39.2 MPG
6.0 l/100km+36%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.