Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Polo 2001 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Polo from 2001 to 2005 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 11% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 13% higher. Starting from 2001 Volkswagen Polo average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was significantly higher than average, at 2002 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became slightly above industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen PoloAll carmakersVolkswagen Polo
2001+5%+11% +6%+11%
Show all years
2002+6%+10% +7%+11%
2003+6%+10% +8%+11%
2004+7%+10% +9%+11%
2005+8%+10% +10%+11%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Polo.

2001 - 2005

Volkswagen Polo 2001 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines33.7 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+10%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+11%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Polo 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1 liters per 100 km or 16% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Polo with automatic transmission consumes around 1.1 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Polo fuel economy is significantly above average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.4 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Polo 2003 1.4 16V FSI 86 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.2 55 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+14%
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.2 12V 65 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+15%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 16V 75 Hp 75 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+9%
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 16V 75 Hp Automatic 75 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+9%
Volkswagen Polo 2003 1.4 16V FSI 86 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+7%
Volkswagen Polo 2002 1.4 16V 100 Hp 100 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+3%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 TDI 75 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+16%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.9 SDI 64 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.9 TDI 100 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+10%
2001 - 2005

Volkswagen Polo 2001 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines33.7 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+10%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+11%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Polo 2001 with automatic transmission consumes on average 1 liters per 100 km or 16% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Polo with automatic transmission consumes around 1.1 litres per 100 km or 16% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Polo fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.4 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Polo 2003 1.4 16V FSI 86 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2002 1.2 55 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+14%
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.2 12V 65 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+15%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 16V 75 Hp 75 HP manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+9%
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 16V 75 Hp Automatic 75 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+9%
Volkswagen Polo 2003 1.4 16V FSI 86 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km+7%
Volkswagen Polo 2002 1.4 16V 100 Hp 100 HP manual 34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km
33.1 MPG
7.1 l/100km+3%
1.4 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 TDI 75 HP manual 52.3 MPG
4.5 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+16%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.9 SDI 64 HP manual 50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km
47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.9 TDI 100 HP manual 48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km
43.6 MPG
5.4 l/100km+10%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.