Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Polo 2009 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Polo from 2009 to 2014 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 12% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 11% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 13% higher. Starting from 2009 Volkswagen Polo average difference between actual owner-reported fuel consumption and stated consumption was slightly above industry average, at 2011 it was similar to average, at 2012 difference between owner-reported and advertised fuel economy became less than industry average. For more details, see the table below.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen PoloAll carmakersVolkswagen Polo
2009+14%+18% +14%+22%
Show all years
2010+16%+18% +16%+22%
2011+19%+18% +19%+22%
2012+21%+18% +23%+22%
2013+23%+18% +27%+22%
2014+26%+18% +30%+22%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Polo.

2009 - 2014

Volkswagen Polo 2009 hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines41.7 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.7 MPG
6.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+17%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines55.7 MPG
4.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines47.0 MPG
5.0 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+18%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Volkswagen Polo 2009 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Polo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.1 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Polo fuel economy is slightly better than average. The best fuel economy in its class of all the modifications has one with 1.6 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI 105 Hp 105 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 60 Hp 60 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+18%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 70 Hp 70 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+18%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+16%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.4 85 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+15%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.4 Automatic 85 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+16%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI 75 Hp 75 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km+12%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI 90 Hp 90 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km+17%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI 90 Hp Automatic 90 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+21%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI 105 Hp 105 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+24%
2009 - 2014

Volkswagen Polo 2009 3 doors hatchback fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+20%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines59.8 MPG
3.9 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines47.7 MPG
4.9 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+27%

According to advertised fuel consumption, Volkswagen Polo 2009 with automatic transmission have almost the same fuel economy as similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Polo with automatic transmission consumes around 0.2 litres per 100 km or 3% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

Compared to similar cars from other manufacturers, the Volkswagen Polo fuel economy is significantly above average. The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.4 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Polo 2009 GTI 1.4 180 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Polo with 1.2 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 TDI 75 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 60 Hp 60 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+18%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 70 Hp 70 HP manual 42.8 MPG
5.5 l/100km
36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km+18%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 TSI 105 HP manual 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
37.3 MPG
6.3 l/100km+19%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 TSI Automatic 105 HP automatic 44.4 MPG
5.3 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+25%
1.2 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.2 TDI 75 HP manual 71.3 MPG
3.3 l/100km
50.0 MPG
4.7 l/100km+42%
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.4 85 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+15%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.4 Automatic 85 HP automatic 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km+16%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 GTI 1.4 180 HP automatic 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km+27%
1.6 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI 90 HP manual 56.0 MPG
4.2 l/100km
48.0 MPG
4.9 l/100km+17%
Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 TDI Automatic 90 HP automatic 54.7 MPG
4.3 l/100km
45.2 MPG
5.2 l/100km+21%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.