Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Volkswagen Passat 2005 fuel consumption

Volkswagen Passat from 2005 to 2010 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 16% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. Since 2005 the Volkswagen Passat average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersVolkswagen PassatAll carmakersVolkswagen Passat
2005+8%+7% +10%+4%
Show all years
2006+9%+7% +11%+5%
2007+11%+7% +12%+5%
2008+12%+7% +13%+4%
2009+14%+7% +14%+5%
2010+16%+7% +16%+5%

See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volkswagen Passat.

2005 - 2010

Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant wagon fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines28.9 MPG
8.1 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines26.8 MPG
8.8 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+5%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines37.4 MPG
6.3 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines36.4 MPG
6.5 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+3%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Passat 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.3 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Passat with automatic transmission consumes around 0.4 litres per 100 km or 5% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.8 petrol engine and automatic transmission (Volkswagen Passat 2009 Variant 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Passat with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 TDI 140 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2009 Variant 1.4 EcoFuel TSI 150 HP manual 33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km
Volkswagen Passat 2009 Variant 1.4 EcoFuel TSI 150 HP automatic 34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 1.6 102 HP manual 30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km0%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+3%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP automatic 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+4%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2008 Variant 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP manual 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+11%
Volkswagen Passat 2008 Variant 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP automatic 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km0%
Volkswagen Passat 2009 Variant 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP automatic 31.8 MPG
7.4 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+5%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP manual 28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km+5%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP automatic 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
23.8 MPG
9.9 l/100km+11%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 16V FSI 4Motion 150 HP 4x4 manual 26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km
26.7 MPG
8.8 l/100km-1%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 16V Turbo FSI 200 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+9%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 16V Turbo FSI 200 HP automatic 26.1 MPG
9.0 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+9%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 Variant 1.9 TDI 105 HP manual 40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km0%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 TDI 140 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+8%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 TDI 140 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+5%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 2.0 TDI 4Motion 140 HP 4x4 manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
33.6 MPG
7.0 l/100km+4%
Volkswagen Passat 2006 Variant 2.0 TDI 170 HP manual 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Passat 2006 Variant 2.0 TDI 170 HP automatic 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+3%
3.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 Variant 3.2 V6 FSI 4Motion 250 HP 4x4 automatic 23.3 MPG
10.1 l/100km
21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km+7%
2005 - 2010

Volkswagen Passat 2005 sedan fuel economy

Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines29.6 MPG
8.0 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines27.4 MPG
8.6 l/100km
Average real gasoline consumption difference *+8%
Average advertised fuel consumption for diesel engines37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
Average real-world fuel consumption for diesel engines36.5 MPG
6.4 l/100km
Average real diesel consumption difference *+4%

According to advertised fuel consumption, a Volkswagen Passat 2005 with automatic transmission consumes on average 0.4 liters per 100 km or 5% more fuel than similar versions with manual gearbox. Based on user-reported real-world fuel consumption, this generation Volkswagen Passat with automatic transmission consumes around 0.5 litres per 100 km or 6% more fuel than a version with the same engine but a manual gearbox.

The best real fuel economy in its class according to user reviews of all the modifications has modification with 1.8 petrol engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Passat 2008 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP). However, of all modifications the best advertised fuel economy in its class has Volkswagen Passat with 2.0 diesel engine and manual transmission (Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 TDI 140 HP).

ModificationClaimed consumptionReal consumption
1.4 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2008 1.4 TSI 122 HP manual 35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km
32.2 MPG
7.3 l/100km+11%
Volkswagen Passat 2009 1.4 TSI DSG 122 HP automatic 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.1 MPG
6.9 l/100km+8%
1.6 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 1.6 102 HP manual 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+1%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP manual 31.4 MPG
7.5 l/100km
30.2 MPG
7.8 l/100km+4%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 1.6 16V FSI 116 HP automatic 30.5 MPG
7.7 l/100km
28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km+6%
1.8 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2008 1.8 TSI 152 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
Volkswagen Passat 2009 1.8 TSI DSG 152 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
Volkswagen Passat 2008 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP manual 30.9 MPG
7.6 l/100km
29.0 MPG
8.1 l/100km+7%
Volkswagen Passat 2008 1.8 16V TSI 160 HP automatic 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
28.0 MPG
8.4 l/100km+2%
1.9 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 1.9 TDI 105 HP manual 42.0 MPG
5.6 l/100km
40.6 MPG
5.8 l/100km+4%
2.0 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP manual 28.7 MPG
8.2 l/100km
27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km+4%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 16V FSI 150 HP automatic 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
23.5 MPG
10.0 l/100km+15%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 16V FSI 4Motion 150 HP 4x4 manual 27.0 MPG
8.7 l/100km
25.8 MPG
9.1 l/100km+5%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 16V Turbo FSI 200 HP manual 29.8 MPG
7.9 l/100km
26.4 MPG
8.9 l/100km+13%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 16V Turbo FSI 200 HP automatic 27.7 MPG
8.5 l/100km
24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km+15%
2.0 liter diesel engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 TDI 140 HP manual 39.9 MPG
5.9 l/100km
36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km+8%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 TDI 140 HP automatic 37.9 MPG
6.2 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+10%
Volkswagen Passat 2005 2.0 TDI 4Motion 140 HP 4x4 manual 35.1 MPG
6.7 l/100km
32.7 MPG
7.2 l/100km+7%
Volkswagen Passat 2008 2.0 TDI 4Motion 140 HP 4x4 manual 36.8 MPG
6.4 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+6%
Volkswagen Passat 2006 2.0 TDI 170 HP manual 38.6 MPG
6.1 l/100km
35.6 MPG
6.6 l/100km+8%
Volkswagen Passat 2006 2.0 TDI 170 HP automatic 36.2 MPG
6.5 l/100km
34.6 MPG
6.8 l/100km+5%
3.2 liter petrol engine
Volkswagen Passat 2005 3.2 V6 FSI 4Motion 250 HP 4x4 automatic 24.0 MPG
9.8 l/100km
21.8 MPG
10.8 l/100km+10%

* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.

User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.