Volvo S60 2018 fuel consumption
Volvo S60 from 2018 to 2021 real fuel consumption according to user reports is approximately 10% higher compared to advertised fuel consumption. For petrol engines real consumption is in average 7% higher, but for diesel engines is approximately 13% higher. Since 2018 the Volvo S60 average difference between owner-reported real-world fuel consumption and declared fuel economy has been less than industry average.
Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values
| Year | Gasoline cars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All carmakers | Volvo S60 | |||
| 2018 | +28% | +4% | ||
| Show all years | ||||
| 2019 | +27% | +4% | ||
| 2020 | +27% | +4% | ||
| 2021 | +26% | +4% | ||
See below for the actual consumption of generations and versions of Volvo S60.
2018
Volvo S60 2018 fuel economy
| Average advertised fuel consumption for petrol engines | 30.0 MPG 7.9 l/100km |
| Average real-world fuel consumption for petrol engines | 29.3 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
| Average real gasoline consumption difference * | +3% |
The table below shows the real and claimed fuel consumption and the differences for specific versions.
| Modification | Claimed consumption | Real consumption |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 liter petrol engine | ||
| Volvo S60 2018 2.0 T4 190 HP automatic | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+4% |
| Volvo S60 2018 2.0 T5 249 HP automatic | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
30.9 MPG 7.6 l/100km+6% |
| Volvo S60 2018 2.0 T5 AWD 249 HP automatic | 27.0 MPG 8.7 l/100km |
27.4 MPG 8.6 l/100km-1% |
| Volvo S60 2018 2.0 254 HP automatic | 32.7 MPG 7.2 l/100km |
28.3 MPG 8.3 l/100km+15% |
| Volvo S60 2018 2.0 AWD 310 HP automatic | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
|
| Volvo S60 2018 2.0 AWD 320 HP automatic | 29.4 MPG 8.0 l/100km |
|
* - Difference between advertised and user reported fuel economy has been calculated taking into account only those car versions for which information is available both on the fuel consumption specified by the manufacturer and reported by users.
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.