Real fuel consumption and economy logo

Chrysler real fuel consumption

According to aggregated user reports, the average real fuel consumption of Chrysler cars is approximately 3% higher for gasoline engines and is approximately 8% higher for diesel engines compared to the advertised consumption.

Year-to-year deviations of actual owner-reported average fuel consumption from advertised values

YearGasoline carsDiesel cars
All carmakersChryslerAll carmakersChrysler
2000 +4%+3% +5%minor
Show all years
2001 +5%+3% +6%+3%
2002 +6%+4% +7%+10%
2003 +6%+3% +8%+10%
2004 +7%+6% +9%+12%
2005 +8%+7% +10%+13%
2006 +9%+6% +11%+12%
2007 +11%+6% +12%+12%
2008 +12%+7% +13%+9%
2009 +14%+8% +14%+9%
2010 +16%+8% +16%+9%
2011 +19%+6% +19%+9%
2012 +21%minor +23%-
2013 +23%minor +27%-
2014 +26%minor +30%-
2015 +27%minor +33%-
2016 +28%+5% +36%-
2017 +28%+5% +38%-
2018 +28%+5% +39%-
2019 +27%+5% +37%-
2020 +27%+5% +36%-
2021 +26%+5% +37%-

Among the recent Chrysler gasoline models, the Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Pacifica and Chrysler 300C come closest to meeting the manufacturer's fuel economy ratings.

Select an Chrysler model to see the real fuel consumption of specific engine versions.

Chrysler 300C Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: +9% Diesel: +11%
Chrysler 300M Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: +6%
Chrysler Crossfire Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: +8%
Chrysler Grand Voyager Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: insignificant Diesel: +7%
Chrysler Neon Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: +5%
Chrysler Pacifica Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: +5%
Chrysler PT Cruiser Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: +8% Diesel: +8%
Chrysler Sebring Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: insignificant
Chrysler Stratus Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: insignificant
Chrysler Voyager Real fuel consumption difference:
Petrol: insignificant Diesel: +6%
User-reported fuel consumption may not accurately represent all users' experiences due to variables such as driving conditions, driving style, technical condition of the vehicle, and other circumstances. Thus, it should not be relied upon as a representative indicator.